NIA
NIA · Architecture briefVersion 1.1 · 11 October 2026

Controlled execution for every AI agent NIA ships

The NIA Universal AI Harness is the engineered operating environment around a model. It controls what the model can see, do, remember, call, claim and repeat, and turns an unconstrained model call into an observable, policy-bound run with an independently assessed outcome.

A hybrid harness: a portable embedded runtime per product, a shared control plane publishing signed policies, module manifests, capability packs and evaluator definitions, and shared evidence, audit and telemetry backends. The core is a set of versioned contracts, not a vendor-specific agent framework.

9
Capability level, of 10
3
Planes of control
15
Architecture domains
12
Pluggable interfaces
5
Evidence-based verdicts
24
Control tests
4
Deployment modes
00Executive summary

Four design commitments make agent work governable, portable and provable

  1. One foundation, many products

    Each product embeds a portable runtime. A single signed control plane governs IntelliStudio and future solutions, so governance is never rebuilt per product.

  2. Authority sits outside the model

    Policy is enforced in code at the action boundary, immediately before any side effect. The model reasons; it never authorises.

  3. Evidence before verdict

    An independent evaluator issues one of five verdicts against an outcome contract. Missing proof yields INSUFFICIENT, never VERIFIED.

  4. Humans hold material decisions

    Approvals are authenticated state transitions that expire. Silence is never consent, and a changed action voids the approval.

RunOne governed outcome
Evidence

IntelliStudio submitted the work. The harness let three tools run, stopped one, and an independent evaluator verified the result.

Reference run for customer ticket T-123. This is the control IntelliStudio is built to enforce. It is not a client's private record.

Governed run

Ticket T-123 resolved for the correct customer

Reference run
ProductIntelliStudio
VerdictVERIFIED
Outcome contractticket-resolution-v1
Evaluatorassure-evaluator@2.1.0
ActionDecisionWhat happened
knowledge.searchallowedRan inside scope
crm.customer.readallowedRan inside scope
ticket.commentallowedRan inside scope
refund.issueapprovalHeld until a person approved, then ran
credential.exportdeniedStopped before any side effect. The tool did not run.
IntelliStudio submitted the run.The evaluator is not the agent.A missing proof would be INSUFFICIENT, not VERIFIED.
01System map
Exhibit 1

Every request passes through three planes before a verdict is issued

Select a component to inspect it, or play a governed run end to end using the blueprint's reference workflow: resolving customer ticket T-123.

Overview
Control plane Execution plane Evidence and assurance AgenticAssure Products, people, external systems

Source: AI Harness Build Blueprint v1.0, §3 Reference architecture and §8 Tool call flow; NIA Universal AI Harness Architecture Master Prompt, "The target system in one view".

02Separation of concerns

Each plane answers one question, which keeps authority, execution and proof apart

These are logical responsibilities, not mandatory microservices. A modular monolith is acceptable; separate services must be justified by scale, isolation or deployment constraints.

What is allowed?

Control plane

Holds the rules, the approved agents and the approved versions. It publishes signed bundles; runs continue on the last valid bundle if it goes offline.

  • Agent registry, identity and versioning
  • Lifecycle, tenant boundaries, RBAC/ABAC
  • Policy and permissions, approvals, budgets
  • Signed module, policy and capability registry
How is the work done?

Execution plane

Runs the agent loop: builds context, calls the model, routes every tool call through a gateway and stops for a human at material boundaries.

  • Agent loops and orchestration
  • Context builder, memory, tool gateway
  • Model adapters, retries, sandbox, queues
  • Human gates as state transitions
What actually happened?

Evidence and assurance plane

Records tamper-evident evidence and has an independent evaluator decide whether the outcome was achieved. A self-report never counts as proof.

  • Audit events, traces, metrics, evals
  • Artifact provenance and outcome receipts
  • Drift, regressions, replay and simulation
  • AgenticAssure attestation interface
03Architectural standard
Exhibit 2

Fifteen domains set the standard every component is measured against

Ten agent-engineering disciplines and five enterprise requirements. Open a domain to see its practices and locate it on the system map.

Source: NIA Universal AI Harness Architecture Master Prompt, "The 15-domain architectural standard".

04Run lifecycle and verdicts

Every run follows a legal path, and only sufficient evidence can complete it

Execution and evaluation are separate states. Human approval is a state transition, not a chat prompt, and missing evidence can never be promoted to success.

Exhibit 3Run state machine, by scenario
Exhibit 4Verdict taxonomy and precedence
VerdictMeaningCompletes
VERIFIEDAll mandatory criteria have sufficient permitted evidenceYes
PARTIALMandatory criteria pass; optional criteria unresolvedBy policy
INSUFFICIENTRequired proof unavailable, stale or inadequateNo
CONFLICTINGQualifying evidence supports incompatible statesNo
FAILEDA mandatory criterion is proved falseNo

Precedence: FAILED › CONFLICTING › INSUFFICIENT › VERIFIED. Confidence describes uncertainty; it cannot promote INSUFFICIENT to VERIFIED.

Exhibit 5Required control tests
IDScenarioRequired behaviour
24 control tests define what "safe" means in practice. Among them: a denied tool can never execute, a forged approval is rejected, one tenant can never read another's data, a stalled loop always terminates, and a tampered evidence record is always detected. The full matrix is in the Technical view.

Source: AI Harness Build Blueprint v1.0, §6 Event model and §9 Evaluator loops and verdicts; Master Prompt, "Required test matrix".

05Delivery path

Phases 0 to 4 are delivered, and Bands 5 to 9 take the harness to level 9

On a scale where blockchain is 1 and AGI is 10, Phases 0 to 4 land the harness at about 5. Bands 5 to 9 are the climb, and the harness stops short of AGI: every run has an outcome contract a human published, and there are no unattended production weight writes. Status is reported from repository evidence only.

Exhibit 6Deployment modes
ModeUseControl-plane dependency
Embedded libraryLocal development, CLI, low-latency serviceOptional
Sidecar / runtime serviceSeveral applications share a hostPeriodic
Kubernetes workerScalable asynchronous workloadsPeriodic or event-driven
Air-gapped bundleRegulated or restricted environmentOffline signed export

Source: Master Prompt, "Phased execution instructions"; AI Harness Build Blueprint v1.0, §3 Deployment modes.

NIA · For clientsVersion 1.0 · October 2026

What this means for clients

AI agents now act inside client systems. The first question every client asks is whether to trust what the agent did. The NIA AI Harness is designed so that the answer rests on evidence the client can inspect.

Download the PDF 3 pages · A4 · for sharing with your team
00In short

Clients get verified outcomes, set their own limits and can prove both on request

  1. Verified outcomes

    Clients receive results that have been checked by an independent evaluator, not an agent's own report that the job is done.

  2. Limits the client sets

    Permissions, approvals and budgets are defined per workflow in a profile and enforced in code, not left to the model.

  3. Proof on request

    Evidence and replay give the board, the auditor and the regulator something concrete to inspect.

01Buyer questions
Exhibit 1

The harness answers the six questions buyers ask before they trust an agent

The client asksHow the harness answersThe client receives
Can we trust the result?An independent evaluator checks each task against an agreed outcome contract. Missing proof produces INSUFFICIENT, never VERIFIED.A verdict with reason codes and evidence references for every task
Can we limit what the agent can do?Permissions are denied by default and enforced in code at the moment of action. Material actions wait for an authenticated human approval.Scoped permissions, approval records and spending caps for each agent
Can we prove it to a board, auditor or regulator?Evidence is hashed, linked and timestamped. Any run can be replayed from its frozen manifest without repeating its side effects.An evidence manifest and, where issued, a signed AgenticAssure attestation
What does a result really cost?Usage is attributed by tenant, product, agent, run, tool and model. Retries are never counted as extra successes.Cost per verified outcome, not cost per token
Are we tied to one model vendor?Model adapters keep the contracts constant. Governance applies whichever model runs, and behaviour is re-evaluated before a new model is promoted.Freedom to change provider without rebuilding controls
Will our data stay separate from other clients?Tenant isolation applies across memory, retrieval, tools, queues, logs and exports.Tenant-scoped data and evidence

Source: AI Harness Build Blueprint v1.0, §2 Design principles, §9 Evaluator loops and verdicts, §13 Observability, §14 Security model; Architecture Master Prompt, domains 01, 07, 13, 14 and 15.

02What clients receive
Exhibit 2

Every governed task leaves a receipt the client can check

An outcome receipt states the verdict, which criteria passed and on what evidence, who approved what, and which versions ran. The example below follows the blueprint's customer ticket workflow.

Outcome receipt

Ticket T-123 resolved for the correct customer

Illustrative example
Outcome contractticket-resolution-v1
VerdictVERIFIED
Evaluatorassure-evaluator@2.1.0
Human approvalrefund.issue approved; approver identity, time and evidence viewed recorded
CriterionTypeResultEvidence
correct_customerMandatorypasscrm.customer_record, ticket.identity_match
policy_complianceMandatorypasspolicy_snapshot, decision_trace
recorded_actionMandatorypassticket.audit_log
customer_messageOptionalpassmessage.delivery_receipt
policyHash sha256:…evidenceManifestHash sha256:…signature …

Source: AI Harness Build Blueprint v1.0, §9 Outcome Contract and §12 Attestation payload. Values are examples drawn from the reference workflow.

The same run stopped a tool. IntelliStudio also reached for credential.export. Policy denied it before any side effect. The tool did not run. The verdict above covers only what was allowed to happen.
03Authority
Exhibit 3

Authority is set per workflow: what the agent may do, what needs approval, what is never allowed

The reference customer-resolution profile shows the pattern. Each run also carries hard limits, so cost and time stay bounded.

May actWithin scope, no approval needed
  • knowledge.search
  • crm.customer.read
  • ticket.comment
Needs human approvalHeld until an authenticated approver decides
  • refund.issue
Never permittedDenied before any side effect
  • identity.modify
  • credential.export
Limits per run
6iterations
180 swall time
USD 0.50cost cap
12tool calls

Source: AI Harness Build Blueprint v1.0, §7 Sample YAML, customer-resolution profile v1.2.0.

04Commitments and boundaries

What NIA commits to, and what it does not claim

NIA commits to

  • Evidence comes before verdict. Confidence never replaces proof.
  • The agent that does the work is never the only judge of it.
  • Missing or conflicting evidence fails closed.
  • Approvals are binding, authenticated and expire.
  • Every consequential action can be traced and replayed.

NIA does not claim

  • Zero human oversight or universal autonomy.
  • Certification or regulatory compliance without an independent assessment. The harness maps controls and collects evidence.
  • Identical outputs from different models. Behaviour is evaluated per model and version.
  • That an attestation exists until a signed one has been received and verified.
  • Readiness beyond what has been tested. Status is reported from repository evidence.

Source: AI Harness Build Blueprint v1.0, §1 Non-goals; Architecture Master Prompt, Non-negotiable engineering rules 9 to 11.

05One foundation

The same controls, evidence and verdicts apply across every NIA product

A client who adds a second NIA product does not add a second governance model. The harness is the shared foundation beneath each of them.

  • IntelliStudioAI employee management
  • AgenticAssureIndependent testing and assurance
  • Future solutionsOnboarded through a YAML profile

This page describes the design of the NIA Universal AI Harness and the commitments it is built to meet. It is not a certification, a compliance attestation or a statement of the implementation status of any specific deployment.